25,204
edits
Talk:Innocent/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
Kenny moved page Talk:Innocent to Talk:Innocent/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Structured Discussions from Talk:Innocent
No edit summary |
m (Kenny moved page Talk:Innocent to Talk:Innocent/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Structured Discussions from Talk:Innocent) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Chevalier trivia is biased == | == Chevalier trivia is biased == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 9: | ||
--Regardless of the connotations it received during the Crusades, Chevalier is simply the french term for Knight. Nothing more than that, plain and simple. It's not like we have a massive detail about Noblesse other than it simply being french for a noble. | --Regardless of the connotations it received during the Crusades, Chevalier is simply the french term for Knight. Nothing more than that, plain and simple. It's not like we have a massive detail about Noblesse other than it simply being french for a noble. | ||
I can remove any notions of noble or christianity or the elite or what have you if you so wish, then it's 100% unbiased. | I can remove any notions of noble or christianity or the elite or what have you if you so wish, then it's 100% unbiased. | ||
I'd also like to point out that the 'christian' thing was just what the term Chevalier referred to, not what Ciel is (also, lucielian? scuse me?). I mean, Ara sure ain't Hindu/Buddhist/Whatever else she's gotten for her names haha. | |||
--[[User:ED Senne|ED Senne]] ([[User talk:ED Senne|talk]]) 11:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC) | --[[User:ED Senne|ED Senne]] ([[User talk:ED Senne|talk]]) 11:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
*A lucielian is a made up religion from elsword that is the specific worship or following of Luciela r. Sourcream (it was more or less a joke on their name) and that edit you made is fine, it just bugged me that it said a chevalier was more noble, which is pure opinion on the editors part as to what is more or less noble than whatever is being compared to (in this case a goddess, which from their respective religions tend to be treated as can do no wrong, regardless of what they are the god/goddess of) projecting a lens of specifically christian judgement on the whole thing. | |||