25,204
edits
User talk:Gameboy224: Difference between revisions
→Tabber: new section
(→Tabber: new section) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
*If [[:File:Upgrade_Chance.png|this chart]] is the one being questioned, then the data on that chart originated from the Japanese Elwiki. [http://wikiwiki.jp/ersword/?%C1%F5%C8%F7%B6%AF%B2%BD Here's the data and the summary]. [[User:Rokujou|Rokujou]] ([[User talk:Rokujou|talk]]) 18:54, 2 September 2014 (EDT) | *If [[:File:Upgrade_Chance.png|this chart]] is the one being questioned, then the data on that chart originated from the Japanese Elwiki. [http://wikiwiki.jp/ersword/?%C1%F5%C8%F7%B6%AF%B2%BD Here's the data and the summary]. [[User:Rokujou|Rokujou]] ([[User talk:Rokujou|talk]]) 18:54, 2 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
** Thanks a lot! This data however confirms my 'fears'. Only fluorite-ore has been tested for the levels +7 -> +8 and upward. This means we can only 'approximate' the probability for 'reset to +0' and 'failure' on those levels. However we can only do this, when we exactly know how fluorite-ore works (unfortunately we don't). I will open up a discussion on the US forums so that it can also be discussed there and not only on the German forums. [[User:Kanoichi|Kanoichi]] ([[User talk:Kanoichi|talk]]) 9:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC) | ** Thanks a lot! This data however confirms my 'fears'. Only fluorite-ore has been tested for the levels +7 -> +8 and upward. This means we can only 'approximate' the probability for 'reset to +0' and 'failure' on those levels. However we can only do this, when we exactly know how fluorite-ore works (unfortunately we don't). I will open up a discussion on the US forums so that it can also be discussed there and not only on the German forums. [[User:Kanoichi|Kanoichi]] ([[User talk:Kanoichi|talk]]) 9:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Tabber == | |||
Please avoid using tabber as it causes slowdowns on the wiki. It's still enabled until all traces of tabber being used are removed. -Kenny | |||