User talk:Darkboy132: Difference between revisions

Line 79: Line 79:


:[[User:Darkboy132|Darkboy132]] 07:44, 18 July 2011 (BST)
:[[User:Darkboy132|Darkboy132]] 07:44, 18 July 2011 (BST)
I'm not saying this because I'm trying to spite you, but because from my observation, it is clearly true. Thank you for once again proving my point with your comments. "Arguing" and "giving feedback" are completely different and separate notions; I'm being intentionally stern with you as you have repeatedly ignored nicer comments from only only me, but many other members of this community.
Also, second-hand information is really not reliable, especially if it's been posted in the NA forums by an unknown and unreputable source. One of the things that NA Elsword forumers claim is that getting over 20% stats in any of the capped stats will make you faster/more accurate/give you more dodges, which is completely untrue, for example; in other words, it has a tendency to be notoriously biased and uninformed, based upon conjecture and rumor. This remains true of any second-hand source. Anyone can claim to have "experience in KR", and this should be absolutely no grounds to judge whether a person is reliable or not - there are plenty of people who play KR without much experience or expertise in the game. Whether or not information is given to you personally by a source makes absolutely no difference either. Verify with primary sources only or you have no grounds to make a change. We revert your changes because we can personally test whether your claim is true or not, and because we have personally tested whether it's true or not; you can't do that with second-hand information.
Finally, I personally ignored your question because it was clearly frivolous, irrelevant and trifling. Your reputation does not cede you well either, and that only contributed to me not bothering to answer your question. I can only speculate that others did the same for similar reasons.
--[[User:Conspire|Conspire]] 07:58, 18 July 2011 (BST)
260

edits