Template talk:Characters

From Elwiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Position of classes

Following: Characters Lineup.png
JobPlacement.png

Frame of the icons

Image Used for
Frame.png All Characters/Classes' icons
TransFrame.png All Transcendent Classes's icons
EpicNPCFrame.png All Epic NPCs' icons (prepare to renew in the future)

April Fools' Characters Icon

ElswordAFNEW.png AishaAFNEW.png RenaAFNEW.png RavenAFNEW.png EveAFNEW.png ChungAFNEW.png AraAFNEW.png ElesisAFNEW.png AddAFNEW.png LuAFNEW.png CielAFNEW.png

Transcendence

Trans.png

Streamlining

If the wiki editor were in HTML (or were simpler) and I had editing privileges I would actually try to do what I want to propose on my own, but its not, and I don't. I'd also like to know the general community consensus on how the new character template looks, just in case I'm in the minority.

I personally preferred the old format with this thing > Arrowsplit6.png

It was smaller and seemed more compact. On the other hand, I can see where someone would be coming from when wanting to have the base job class names shown too. All in all, I think it could work better with something like this:

     EveNEW.png Eve (Another Code)
Arrowsplit6.png
CENEW.png
Code: Exotic

Arrowdown2.png
CNNEW.png
Code: Nemesis

TrantestC.png
CNTransNEW.png
Code: Nemesis
(Transcendence)


CANEW.png
Code:
Architecture

Arrowdown2.png
CMNEW.png
Code: Empress

TrantestC.png
CEmTransNEW.png
Code: Empress
(Transcendence)


CLNEW.png
Code: Electra

Arrowdown2.png
CBSNEW.png
Code: Battle
Seraph

TrantestC.png
CBSTransNEW.png
Code: Battle
Seraph
(Transcendence)

Compact and informative. Thoughts?

Ok if I actually made the whole thing would someone who can edit it be willing to put it in at all or

Hatoko (talk) 16:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Reason why I changed if from the old version was due to the arrows. They didn't scale up with better resolution monitors. So on wider screens, the arrows would just point at nothing. So I changed it to the current format where the arrows are just a part of each column. Added the base portrait as a bit extra, wasn't necassary in the slightest but I thought it just tied it together better than just having 3 separate columns. Gameboy224 (talk) 17:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
    • Right, I guess there would be no way to fix that otherwise at this point. I suppose I'll think about it, see if I can come up with a solution as well. Hatoko (talk) 01:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)