Talk:Awakened Will: Infinity Sword: Difference between revisions
From Elwiki
(→About Tips and Details: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Oddly, the {{CDRU}}{{CDeX}}{{CViX}}{{CViX}} combo only triggers 1 stack of this passive." How is that odd? Only the last {{CViX}} uses the Conwell, and the cooldown would prevent it from triggering any more stacks. [[User:FlareKyn|FlareKyn]] ([[User talk:FlareKyn|talk]]) 07:55, 17 April 2020 (EDT) | "Oddly, the {{CDRU}}{{CDeX}}{{CViX}}{{CViX}} combo only triggers 1 stack of this passive." How is that odd? Only the last {{CViX}} uses the Conwell, and the cooldown would prevent it from triggering any more stacks. [[User:FlareKyn|FlareKyn]] ([[User talk:FlareKyn|talk]]) 07:55, 17 April 2020 (EDT) | ||
*Ah, this was from before the update that allowed it to stack from skills. It only triggered from commands, with no reactivation cooldown, and things like ZZ[Z] stacked it twice because it dealt 2 hits, just like >>^XX[X] (which was the only command that hit more than once but only stacked once). No longer applies due to the cooldown of course. Removed. --[[User:ED Senne|ED Senne]] ([[User talk:ED Senne|talk]]) 12:21, 17 April 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:21, 17 April 2020
About Tips and Details
"Oddly, the 
combo only triggers 1 stack of this passive." How is that odd? Only the last uses the Conwell, and the cooldown would prevent it from triggering any more stacks. FlareKyn (talk) 07:55, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
- Ah, this was from before the update that allowed it to stack from skills. It only triggered from commands, with no reactivation cooldown, and things like ZZ[Z] stacked it twice because it dealt 2 hits, just like >>^XX[X] (which was the only command that hit more than once but only stacked once). No longer applies due to the cooldown of course. Removed. --ED Senne (talk) 12:21, 17 April 2020 (EDT)
